- #ZETETIC ASTRONOMY EARTH NOT A GLOBE BY PARALLAX PRO#
- #ZETETIC ASTRONOMY EARTH NOT A GLOBE BY PARALLAX LICENSE#
Cause of Solar and Lunar EclipsesĬhapter XIII.
![zetetic astronomy earth not a globe by parallax zetetic astronomy earth not a globe by parallax](https://i.etsystatic.com/12830911/r/il/97c9a0/2110143806/il_fullxfull.2110143806_o5d4.jpg)
Cause of Sun Appearing Larger When Rising and Setting Than at NoondayĬhapter XI. Cause of Day and Night, Winter and Summer and the Long Alternations of Light and Darkness at the Northern CentreĬhapter X. The Sun’s Path Expands and Contracts Daily for Six Months AlternatelyĬhapter VIII. The Sun’s Motion, Concentric With the Polar CentreĬhapter VII. The True Form and Magnitude of the EarthĬhapter VI. The Earth No Axial or Orbital MotionĬhapter IV. Experiments Demonstrating the True Form of Standing Water, and Proving the Earth to be a Plane IntroductionĬhapter III. Zetetic and Theoretic Defined and ComparedĬhapter II.
#ZETETIC ASTRONOMY EARTH NOT A GLOBE BY PARALLAX PRO#
If you ever have to debate the flat earth pro or con, this book is a complete agenda of each point that you’ll have to argue.Ĭhapter I. Zetetic Astronomy is a key work of flat-earth thought, just as Donnelly’s Atlantis, the Antediluvian World is still considered required reading on the subject of Atlantis.
#ZETETIC ASTRONOMY EARTH NOT A GLOBE BY PARALLAX LICENSE#
As far as I can see this is simply a license to employ circular reasoning ( e.g., the earth is flat, hence we can see distant lighthouses, hence the earth is flat). To make his system work he had to throw out a great deal of science, including the scientific method itself, using instead what he calls a ‘Zetetic’ method. If the Copernican theory so adequately explains planetary motions, why discard it, and what would he use in its place? What is the sun orbiting around once a day and how does it work like a spotlight, not a ‘point source’? If the moon is self-luminous, what creates its phases? If gravity appears to work here on earth, why doesn’t it apply to the celestial objects just a few hundred miles up? Rowbotham never adequately explains his alternative astronomy. He attacks the concept of a plurality of worlds because no other world than this one is mentioned in the Bible. He uses Ussherian Biblical chronology to mock the concept that stars could be millions of light years away. Heaven is not a state of mind, it is a real place, somewhere above us. Hell is exactly as advertised, directly below us. Zetetic cosmology is ‘faith-based’, based, that is, on a literal interpretation of selected Biblical quotes. Eclipses can be explained by some unknown object occulting the sun or moon. The moon is both self-illuminated and semi-transparent. The sun orbits the north pole once a day at a constant altitude. The Zetetic Sun, moon, planets and stars are all only a few hundred miles above the surface of the earth. I think that by the 19th century people would have noticed if Australia and Africa were thousands of miles further apart than expected, let alone if Africa was wider than it was long!
![zetetic astronomy earth not a globe by parallax zetetic astronomy earth not a globe by parallax](https://ua-rtip.org/sites/ua-rtip.org/files/styles/uaqs_fixed_width/public/images/publications/rowbotham_title.jpg)
The Zetetic map has a severly squashed South America and Africa, and Australia and New Zealand in the middle of the Pacific. Figure 54 inadvertantly illustrates this problem. The polar projection of the flat earth creates obvious discrepancies with known geography, particularly the farther south you go. What we call the North Pole is in the center of the earth. The lands we know are surrounded by an infinite wilderness of ice and snow, beyond the Antarctic ocean, bordered by an immense circular ice-cliff. The continents float on an infinite ocean which somehow has a layer of fire underneath it. Rowbotham believed that the earth is flat. Rowbotham hints at the incident in this book. The judge ruled against Hampton, who started a long campaign of legal harassment of Wallace. An experiment which Hampden proposed didn’t resolve the issue, and the two ended up in court in 1876. One of them, John Hampden, got involved in a bet with the famous naturalist Alfred Russel Wallace about the flat earth. Rowbotham was an accomplished debater who reputedly steamrollered all opponents, and his followers, who included many well-educated people, were equally tenacious. The third edition of 1881 (which had inflated to 430 pages) was used as the basis of this etext. This book, in which he lays out his world system, went through three editions, starting with a 16 page pamphlet published in 1849 and a second edition of 221 pages published in 1865. Samuel Birley Rowbotham, under the pseudonym ‘Parallax’, lectured for two decades up and down Britain promoting his unique flat earth theory. Once you get into his book one can easily understand the flat earth concept as well as his use of facts, reason, logic and direct observation led him to believe in the flat plane earth.
![zetetic astronomy earth not a globe by parallax zetetic astronomy earth not a globe by parallax](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/edMAAOSwaiBb2p8C/s-l640.jpg)
Rowbotham deserves a huge amount of credit for this in depth research. This book is for those wishing to understand better what many, many ancient civilizations as well as many biblical quotes believed to be the shape and purpose of our Earth and stars. ~ I disagree with several of these comments by this book reviewer.